![]() | |
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Consumer Alert - Business Alert - Ripoff Misrepresentation, ripoffs, unfulfiled claims, consumer dissatisfactions, Attorney General ALERTS, POLICE ALERTS - TELL US YOUR EXPERIENCE |
![]() |
| | LinkBack (1) | Thread Tools | Rating: | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||||
| |||||
Quote:
Quote:
Rose DesRochers, a so called internet guru/Shawn DesRochers a profess internet engineer. How do they make a living. Being a writer or hosting other sites? Quote:
|
|
#4
| ||||
| ||||
Rose: Scrub tells me that you come highly recommended. I visited your site and must say you are doing an outstanding job. 600 plus members is a lot. Keep up the good work. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
Thank you Julie. Read more with regards to WritersWorld Rose DesRochers http://www.todays-woman.net/poetry-scams-43.html http://www.todays-woman.net/poetry-scams-37.html |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
Rose only tried to remove her posts from this website. She removed her post yesterday to log in today and have them put back by you scrub and now you post that she has been banned for abuse. There was no abuse here. These are her posts and she removed them. Also you have restored the links to articles that has she written. If you are going to remove her, do you not think you should remove any content that she has added to this website? How do I know because I am Rose. Now please remove my posts and I wish you success with your website. |
|
#7
| ||||
| ||||
Rose has no rights to remove posts once they have been restored by Scrub. Besides, my interaction and observation of Rose behavior on www.scam.com has been confrontational. I don't need this around here. Thanks for inquiring and I wish Rose all the Best.... Quit registering under the many different names..... Scrub |
|
#8
| ||||
| ||||
Sure hope you find a way to communicate with Scrub. From what I have seen, he's a really nice guy. You may have upset him. Anyway, I'll send him an email and see if you two can patch things up. Bye |
|
#9
| ||||
| ||||
To:admin@todays-woman.net From: dnsadmin@ScamFraudAlert.com Subject: Unfortunately, it not going to work out Rose/AngelEye: Some members of ScamFraudAlert.com requested that we patch our differences and work together since we are trying to built a new friendly community. I took their advice and invited you backed in anticipation that you would let go and be a valuable part of us. Unfortunately, you've decided that you do not want to be a part of our forum and have continue to delete postings. The posting are yours but deleting them at this time just hurt our mission. Remember you deleted postings that were yours and some that weren't when ScamFraudAlert.comfirst got started. With this being said, I think it's in all best interest that we go our separate ways. Be of Luck and I really do appreciate your input. Scrub From :"Rose DesRochers" <admin@todays-woman.net> To : <admin@scamfraudalert.com> Subject : Hello Date : Wed, 31 Aug 2005 14:07:24 -0400 You have requested I come back and once again you ban my ip. Rose DesRochers Founder and Administrator http://www.todays-woman.net Today's Woman is a supportive online community for men and women over 18. Our goal is to help writers succeed in the writing industry. We offer a useful selection of services including author interviews, regular columns , interactive forums, and a place to share your writing for critiques by your peers. |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
I must tell you Scrub that Rose DesRochers has a reputation that follows her. Take a look at these urls and you be the judge. http://forums.writersweekly.com/viewtopic.php?t=4120 http://www.writers.net/forum/read/6/9691/9691Vf http://www.ripoffreport.com/results....&Search=Search She has caused problem to every forum or board I seen her posting. She uses many different aliases. Do not trust a thing about her and her husband Shawn. They both need help. Best of Luck and keep up the good work....... |
|
#11
| ||||
| ||||
Yep Ann. I agreed with you. Rose always find ways to create problems where non exists. http://www.scam.com/showthread.php?t=1414 http://www.scam.com/showthread.php?t=1710 http://www.scam.com/showthread.php?t=1282 |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
OK then I'm trying to find out weather or not i should trust poetry.com and all i see is arguing. is this a help site or just another chat site? i would like some help. can any one give me info. on a good poetry site no scams please. |
|
#13
| ||||
| ||||
From: Graham Cook @ ScamFraudAlert <grahamcook@writersworld.co.uk> To: admin@scamfraudalert.com Date: 7 Apr 2006 22:33:31 -0000 Subject: ScamFraudAlert Contact Us Form - Site Feedback Reply | Reply to all | Forward | Print | Add sender to Contacts list | Delete this message | Report phishing | Show original | Message text garbled? The following message was sent to you via the ScamFraudAlert Contact Us form by Graham Cook. Dear Sir or Madam, I see that you are publishing adverse comments about my company Writersworld and me. Would you please be so kind as to take a look at www.ourdotcom.co.uk and my website www.writersworld.co.uk Hopefully you will see I am not the person portrayed and what is going on here is a vile campaign perpetrated by competitors abusing the power of the Internet. Any advice and thoughts you may have would be greatfully appreciated. Regards, Graham Cook Referring Page: http://www.scamfraudalert.com/ IP Address: 86.133.50.99 User Name: Unregistered User ID: 0 Reply Forward Invite Graham to Gmail ScamFraudAlert to grahamcook Hide options 10:11 pm (1 hour ago) From: ScamFraudAlert <scamfraudalert@gmail.com> Mailed-By: gmail.com To: grahamcook@writersworld.co.uk Date: Apr 7, 2006 10:11 PM Subject: Re: ScamFraudAlert Contact Us Form - Site Feedback Reply | Reply to all | Forward | Print | Add sender to Contacts list | Delete this message | Report phishing | Show original | Message text garbled? Dear Mr. Cook, The person responsible for those posts or writings is no longer a member of our forum. That individual has a reputation of posting misleading information about other sites and all derogatory posts regarding writersworld does not appear on www.scamfrarualert.com. However, the individual responsible name does appear as a link to writersworld and we do intend to keep it that way. We sincerely apologized for any hardship or inconvenience this may have cause you. - Show quoted text - On 7 Apr 2006 22:33:31 -0000, Graham Cook @ ScamFraudAlert <grahamcook@writersworld.co.uk> wrote: The following message was sent to you via the ScamFraudAlert Contact Us form by Graham Cook. Dear Sir or Madam, I see that you are publishing adverse comments about my company Writersworld and me. Would you please be so kind as to take a look at www.ourdotcom.co.uk and my website www.writersworld.co.uk Hopefully you will see I am not the person portrayed and what is going on here is a vile campaign perpetrated by competitors abusing the power of the Internet. Any advice and thoughts you may have would be greatfully appreciated. Regards, Graham Cook -------------------------------- Referring Page: http://www.scamfraudalert.com/ User Name: Unregistered User ID: 0 -- Sincerely, Admin ScamFraudAlert.com A Victim Forum - Surf Safe & Wise
__________________ |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
well, I have to say that it is a good idea to read the links provided. it gave me some insight on how odd people can be. if i were to publish writersworld limited would be my first look. good for them not to back down, nor give in they seem to be stronger, and more aware. thank you be seeing them soon. |
|
#15
| |||
| |||
My name is Graham Cook. I am the founder and owner of www.writersworld.co.uk For over six long years I have worked to build the most ethical, legal, fairest, kindest print on demand book publishing company in the world, which I feel I have done and which is evidenced by the various household corporate names that want to buy my company which is not up for sale at any price (as is clearly stated on are About Us button). Amongst all else our clients get their own ISBN number and buy their books at print cost and get 100% of their royalties. About 18 months ago I approached the DesRochers to build a mini website system for our authors which would have been on their servers in Canada or wherever they are located. After a while I became concerned about their changing the rules and their conduct and attitude so I pulled the plug. As it turned out this was the best decision I have made in the history of my company which is evidenced by their subsequent irresponsible conduct. Had we not discontinued with our business relationship with the DesRochers, life would have become a nightmare with our clients’ mini websites on their servers and at their mercy along with us. The hypocrisy of the DesRochers is simply stunning. Through their website www.invision-graphics.com they have set themselves up as the arch proponents of website copying or plagerising while at the same they were working hand in hand with one of their cohorts - a Mrs Shahida Rahman to try and destroy my company, their cohort Mrs Shahida Rahman was operating a plagiarised version of www.writersworld.co.uk from a computer belonging to us she refused to return. Please see www.ourdotcom.co.uk The DesRochers have sat in Canada thinking they are immune from us commencing litigation against them due to the logistics of them being in Canada and the expense of protracted litigation in far-off shores. Well, they are about to have the tables turned on them. The United Kingdom and Canada are signatories to various treaties allowing us to sue in the English High Court for libel and defamation etc which mean if they do not defend against our action, the resulting judgment will be as enforceable as if it were obtained in their local court. As amongst all else they have falsely alleged I am involved in criminal activity I am entitled to what is known as Damagers Per Se which is a minimum of £100, 000.00 plus costs. Why is English High Court the proper venue? Because the UK is the predominant place of business for WRITERSWORLD and the intent was to damage us here, and all the key witnesses are here. Added to this, the DesRochers have another problem resultant from a landmark case that has just come down in the English Courts wherein which chatrooms etc, the hosting company and website are now held as liable as the person doing the posting itself. Now we will be naming as co-defendants all persons and entities who have posted or repeated the DesRochers false allegations.. The landmark case has resulted in chatrooms and similar forums disappearing at a rapid rate, with both the hosting company and website owner having to pay huge damages along with the person doing the posting.The defendants in this action not only had to pay substantial damages, they were also ordered to pay costs which exceeded $400,000.00 as in the United Kingdom the losing party pays costs. Through their own wilful, cruel and vile actions the DesRochers will end up on the wrong end of a lawsuit they cannot defend against, of which we will be able to collect on as if that judgement was obtained at their own local Court House As to the DesRochers, we shall be asking the Court to reserve jurisdiction over them, again enforceable in the Canadian Courts if these false allegations pop up again. Simply put, they will end up losing their businesses and bankrupting themselves though their own actions. It is well known this is not the first time they have conducted themselves in such a way on the Internet, using malicious postings to ‘resolve’ disputes as Rose DesRochers has been banned from other websites for her unethical postings. As to my operating a scam the text below it what appears at our Website and goes out each week at the end of our Newsletter. WORDS TO THE WISE Whether you use WRITERSWORLD or any other print on demand company insist that when your book is published you have a direct account with the printer. This will cost you nothing and you will end up with 100% of the royalties and the ability to purchase copies of your books at cost. Yes, with WRITERSWORLD, you get 100% of the royalties on sales of your book! You will get exactly the same distribution rights as the print on demand publisher and a monthly e-mail letting you know what your sales are. With respect, do not leave your book in the hands of any print on demand book publisher and be dependent on the publisher to know what your sales and royalties are and allow them to profit from the sales of your book. Also insist that your books ISBN number is issued to you and your books imprint page reflects you as being the publisher. |
|
#16
| |||
| |||
Hi, I haven't read all the preceding messages so I'm a bit confused about who everyone is but I do want to post my own message about Writersworld. They are selling a pirate copy of my grandmother's book, (which I edited) in spite of warning letters from my lawyer. They have no rights in it whatsoever. It is a horrible tacky production. I originally paid them to set it up as a POD book, then was so horrified by the finished product that I asked them not to sell it. Since then I have seen many many second hand copies for sale alongside the new, (these must have been sold by them originally) - but I have of course never seen a penny from it and I am very embarrassed to have my name and my grandmother's name on something so tacky. The book has since been published under a different name but this one remains on amazon.com and many other web sites. (No doubt draining sales from the authorised editions). I would advise any other writers to avoid this company like the plague. Graham Cook, the 'managing director' tells sob stories about his own life to win customers confidence, so beware this tactic. I was told a great many tragic tales, and naively wished to help him. Philippa. |
|
#17
| ||||
| ||||
Rose DesRochers to me Hide options 8:55 am (10 hours ago) From: Rose DesRochers <admin@todays-woman.net> Mailed-By: todays-woman.net Reply-To: admin@todays-woman.net To: scamfraudalert@gmail.com Date: Apr 10, 2006 8:55 AM Subject: FW: WritersWorld Reply | Reply to all | Forward | Print | Add sender to Contacts list | Delete this message | Report phishing | Show original | Message text garbled? -----Original Message----- From: Duncan Bamford [mailto:info@insightillustration.co.uk] Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 10:59 AM To: staff@todays-woman.net Subject: WritersWorld Submitted: July 18, 2005, 10:59 am I.P: 212.84.99.25 Sender's Name: Duncan Bamford Sender's Email: info@insightillustration.co.uk Comment/Request/Message: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dear Rose DesRochers, I am an Illustrator and Cover Designer. Like you, I am also unpaid for work I have done for Writersworld and Graham Cook. Graham has since offered to pay me what he owed me upfront (I have withheld the work done to date), I insisted if he paid 'me' upfront that I would like to know who had edited the books that I had worked on so that I could check that 'they' were also to be paid, this was unacceptable to him. I am now sitting (not literaly) on £800 of book covers that I can't use. I know exactly how you must feel! All the contractors (editors, cover designers, account manager etc) are in the same boat. I don't think we should be squabbling about who told who what. I would particularly like to address the 'charge' against the Writersworld account manager. In my opinion she did all she could to get us (the contractors) our money and to get paid herself. She had no control over the money matters and was as taken in as we all were by Grahams constant promises and supposed good intentions. Also Graham has been shown to be unpredictable, intimidating and made threats to different contractors and even authors - surely you can see that there is a real fear of reprisals. It is very easy to criticise when you're a long way from the situation. I feel it was an honest mistake that she failed to inform you of her withdrawl from the company, I was told immediately as where all the editors and other illustrators who then followed suit in withdrawing from the operations of the company and informing all the authors. Our e-mail accounts where subsequently suspended as soon as Graham new what was happening. I would like to see her name removed from your 'warning' list ASAP. I sincerely hope you will agree with me. If I can be of any help or give you any information (Graham doesn't intimidate me) don't hesitate to get in touch. Best wishes and good luck. Duncan Bamford Insight Illustration Ltd 44(0)1654 703969 I would prefer it if you didn't publish all this l
__________________ |
|
#18
| |||
| |||
Dear All, Duncan Banford is not owed one single penny by my company for one single book finished book cover he produced albeit he ignored my e-mail to him offering as a act of Good Faith offering to pay him for incomplete covers not being aware he was working hand in hand with Mrs Shahida Rahman on her publishing endeavours. What he omits to point out in his false and defamatory e-mail is that is that he not only did design work on Mrs Shahida Rahman's plagiarised website he also designs book covers for her and lest their be any doubt over this his name is on the plagiarised version of our website run by Mrs Shahida Rahman. He may be duplicitous in this e-mail to you but he is not being very smart because as the posting to your website was only made today and the DesRochers were also only copied today with that posting it only goes to further prove the direct contact that there was but is in fact still is. As to his protestations as to "poor innocent" Mrs Shahida Rahman I suggest he study www.ourdotcom.co.uk in more detail as she left a paper trail a mile long as to when she started on her publishing career using a plagiarised version of our website copying and pasting our keywords and using a computer belonging to us that she refused to return to us which is going to make a very interesting point of law when we go to trial against Mrs Shahida Rahman. We can now add Mr Banford to the list of defendants. What on earth does this mean ("Graham doesn't intimidate me") I think my restraint over this whole matter has been nothing short of remarkable and as for being up and running again I was not aware we had been down. What has always intrigued me about all of this is just how self centred these people are and how they thought I would take their appalling conduct just laying dow |